2 views
Narrative Pace in Video: Dynamic, Standard, Calm
How to choose the narrative pace — dynamic, standard, or calm — and why it affects not only the speed of speech but also the structure of phrases in the video.
How to choose the narrative pace — dynamic, standard, or calm — and why it affects not only the speed of speech but also the structure of phrases in the video.
The same voiceover, delivered at different paces, is perceived as two different videos — and it’s not just about the speed at which the voice speaks. In Telematic, the narrative pace is a separate setting in the script with three values: dynamic, standard, and calm — and it changes not only the pauses between phrases but also the very structure of the sentences that make it into the voiceover text. Let’s explore what exactly happens when switching the pace and how to choose the right option for the video format.
It’s important to immediately distinguish between two different effects: the speed of the voice delivery is a separate voiceover setting, while the narrative pace is how the script text is restructured before voiceover. This is why the pace influences editing and the perception of the video more significantly than it may seem at first glance.
Standard pace is the reference point: the text derived from the source material remains structurally unchanged. Phrases are not restructured or repackaged — the script is passed to voiceover in the form it took after applying the script mode and volume slider. This is a reliable default choice if you have no specific reason to adjust the delivery to a more energetic or slower format.
The standard pace is particularly well-suited when the source material is already written in an appropriate rhythm — for example, if an article or transcript is originally composed with oral speech in mind rather than as dry written text.
Dynamic pace in the "full text" and "hybrid" modes is not just about speeding up the voice; it’s about restructuring sentences: long, complex phrases are broken down into shorter, punchier ones, unnecessary introductory constructions are removed, and the narrative is made more impactful. The result is a video that sounds more energetic and better captures attention in the first few seconds, which is especially important for short vertical formats and platforms with high competition for viewer attention.
This pace works well for:
The downside of the dynamic pace is that it does not suit material where thoughtful delivery is important: complex explanations, legal or financial nuances can easily lose part of their meaning if broken down into short, choppy phrases for the sake of energy.
Calm pace is the opposite of dynamic: it gives the text more space, retains more elaborate constructions, and works better where the viewer needs time to comprehend what has been said, rather than just hear an energetic delivery. This is the choice for long explanatory formats, educational content, detailed analyses, and situations where the speed of comprehension is more important than the speed of delivery.
The calm pace is particularly appropriate if the video is intended for background viewing — for example, long analyses that part of the audience listens to rather than actively watches. In such situations, the sharp, choppy phrases of the dynamic pace work against comprehension, while a smoother, calmer delivery facilitates following the thought.
The practical logic of choosing a pace is largely tied to where the video will be published and in what context it will be viewed:
We intentionally tested the same source material at three different paces to see the difference not in theory, but in practice. An analysis of the same news, voiced in a dynamic pace, indeed felt livelier and worked better as a short vertical video — but upon re-listening in a calm pace, it became evident that some nuances of meaning were lost in the dynamic version simply because the phrases were broken down more than necessary for that specific text.
The conclusion we reached: for purely news and promotional content, dynamic pace is almost always justified, while for materials with numbers, conditions, and nuances, calm or standard pace almost always wins, even if the final video appears visually less "lively." One of our clients, who runs a channel analyzing contract terms for small businesses, noticed a significant decrease in questions in the comments like "Can you explain this point again" after switching from dynamic to calm pace — not because the information changed, but because the delivery allowed for more space to perceive the details.
A sensible strategy is not to choose a pace once and for all for the entire channel, but to tie it to the type of content and the publication platform. The same channel can well use dynamic pace for Shorts announcements and calm or standard for the main long format on the same topic. Narrative pace is a script setting, not a brand guideline, and it should be selected for each specific video as consciously as you choose the length and mode of the script.
Script Volume Slider: Compressing and Expanding Text
Video Instead of Images in a Scene: When Photos Are Not Enough